AS THE DECADE ROLLS TOWARDS STUFF

First the heavy, then the light:

KEEP ME POSTED
I am pleased to announce the completion of my video, "Steven Spielberg And The 'Mall Man' Factor", which I posted at Archive.Org yesterday, very early in the morning, December 26, 2009, the day after that big Christian holiday.

ROLL DOWN YOUR, I SAID ROLL, NEVERMIND
As if part of some kind of strange celebration taking place in my mind, yesterday, after the posting (go back to the previous paragraph, click on the link, watch the video, come back here and continue reading), at various times, I imagined I saw driving past me any number of people who exist in relation to the video (actually, I'm pretty sure they don't just exist in relation to the video).

I will list these people here, however, if I am mistaken, and did indeed only imagine our cars driving past each other, the solution would be for you to drive past me some other time (I can think of no other way to make this right):

1. Laura Dern ("Jurassic Park" star; attendee of a Jennifer Aniston party in Beverly Hills earlier this month according to "People")
2. Jennifer Aniston (hostess of a party Laura Dern, star of "Jurassic Park", attended recently)
3. Stanley Tucci ("The Terminal" star)
4. Tom Cruise ("Minority Report" star)
5. Sean Daniel (referenced in video)
6. Steven Spielberg (Executive Producer, "Back To The Future")
7. Bill Clinton (cropped from Spielberg image used in video)
   
8. Candice Bergen (went by three times yesterday, recently of the TV show "Boston Legal," no connection to my legally inconsequential video - perhaps she went by somehow or another in connection with the fact that her answering service's phone number was on the letter Paul McCartney sent to me in 1978 right after Billy Joel sat next to me on a plane, and now Steven Spielberg runs Dreamworks with David Geffen, who was with John Lennon when Lennon was shot December 1980, Lennon and McCartney having been a popular songwriting team during the '60s)
   

WITHOUT GOING INTO DETAIL
Without going into detail, it appears to me that Colbert, on his last show of the year before going on vacation, made inside-references to the video (at that time the video was a work-in-progress posted on earlier blogs). Last year, Colbert's Christmas Special made serious usage of my material (described in an earlier blog).

Without going into detail, SNL continues to makes inside-references to me/my material, and has more clearly indicated that they have an information feed coming to them from what occurs at my 9-5, something that has generally been occurring over the years, and not just in relation to SNL.

Without going into detail, based on specific things known to me, I wouldn't be surprised if the recent death of the star of Amy Heckerling's "Clueless" (see earlier blog references to Heckerling and "Clueless") was murder, though it looks like an accident. What I've put together is too vague to be sure of anything at this point. All we know for sure is that SNL, in consequence of her death, will discontinue their just-begun take-offs on her.

Without going into detail, a star of Spielberg's "Shindler's List" referred to in earlier blogs may have driven past me a few days ago.

Business As Usual-ing The World To Death

Weight Of Part Of The World Time Again
Before I present the latest, 12.13.09 version of my work-in-progress video, "Spielberg and the Mall Man Factor," a little perspective:

(1) If through this video I can prove my singularly incredible, important influence on Spielberg, and

(2) It is widely known that Spielberg is among the most high profile, prominent Jewish people alive today, and

(3) Much of the world situation has to do with reacting to Arabic terrorists intent on going beyond blaming the State of Israel in their quest for somewhere to channel all their hatred, and in truth are motivated to a large degree by a hatred of all Jewish people, then

(4) My previous assertions that terrorist clues of potentially great significance have landed on my doorstep, that my name is on that kind of radar because of my significance, must truly demand action/investigation. In light of certain things, can rationales to the contrary be anything other than grotesquely self-serving in nature, and/or a reflection of stupidity, and/or a reflection of a tremendously corrupt nature?

I have no personal inclination to come within ten miles of this subject on this personal level. However, I recognize that it is unthinkable to bury what I know. I also recognize that it makes no sense that important terrorist clues would ever land on my doorstep, until one appreciates the degree of my importance in relation to Spielberg. This is why the following work-in-progress is so important.

So I guess I'm just saying have fun with it:




Talk And Silence Are Not Cheap
I sent the following email to an assistant of Sean Daniel's several days ago regarding this work-in-progress, and my email technology indicates he never even opened the email. So let's just put that into the category of something non-serious, such as junk mail problems, instead of seeing it as potentially impacting on more than one cares to think about:

I am writing to inquire as to whether Sean Daniel would be interested in appearing in "Steven Spielberg and the 'Mall Man Factor'", my unconventional "video docu story" in which his involvement would unquestionably be instrumental. I know that if you mention my name to Sean in the same breath as the words "Mall Man", he would understand more than I could describe to you in ten pages, and be pleased to have the opportunity to consider my request. I recognize that, if Sean does choose to allow himself to engage in an on-camera discussion on this subject, it would likely only be out of his feeling for the truth, as this project has not the kind of official credential that is generally regarded as a prerequisite in the making of such a request. This project exists in relation to the secret (and admittedly unlikely-sounding) fact that, through Sean's involvement with both myself and his friend, Steven Spielberg, the latter has made my "Mall Man" video (and other things I have created) an important foundation point in a number of his works. And so, I offer you the beginning of this work-in-progress of mine: here I inserted the web address of where this work-in-progress was, however, the work-in-progress version included with this blog replaces it Thank you for your consideration,

Was 1993 Too Long Ago To Count?
Need I remind everyone that in February 1993, five days after my referenced video "Mall Man" was filmed at NYC's World Financial Center (the main part of the shoot), the World Trade Center, an overpass away, was attacked by terrorists. That time, they only made a dent. And that was after Spielberg was already underway with "Jurassic Park," a movie that originated from something I sent to Sean Daniel with a note that he forward it to Steven Spielberg (the first communication I ever asked be directed in this manner). My claim here is irrespective of who technically ending up penning that movie, or the "Jurassic Park" book, etc. I do not say I wrote it, I say that what I sent is what led to its creation. But why listen to me.

Have Jeans, Will Travel

Here's something that may or may not seem worth staring at endlessly trying to see precisely what it adds up to:

The oft-mentioned-in-my-blogs Stuart Cornfeld (who I once knew before he was a film producer, and whose house I once went to in 1975 on the exact same day I saw 10-year-old Ben Stiller with his mom, Anne Meara, at the Century City Shopping Plaza, Stuart and Ben now together running a production company called Red Hour) is producing a movie, "Vamps", written and directed by the several-times-mentioned-in-my-blogs (Oct. 11, 2009 and April 13, 2009) Amy Heckerling.

The star of "Vamps" will be Krysten Ritter, which is among the few things presently known about this movie. So I looked to see if Krysten Ritter had ever been in anything upon which I had been a big influence, it being that I get "included" in an incredible amount of entertainment industry product: apparently not (emphasis on "apparently").

I did happen to notice how one of my important videos, "Gosk" (1994; 1998 - go to Archive.Org) has a title sorta similar to a 2009 short Ritter starred in, "Glock". The similarities to things Steinhoff does not end there. "Glock" was apparently named after a gun, and it turns out that all of the movie's characters are named after guns. When I made "Gosk", it was the one time I followed a similar approach, naming most of the Klugian characters after brand names of jeans (Tuxert/tuxedo being among the exceptions, Vinkalert and Gosk being others).

"Gosk, The Screenplay" (1993; posted at Archive.Org in 2007):
Wrangert = Wrangler; Levert = Levis; Jordert = Jordache; Dockert = Dockers; Buegert = Bugle Boy Jeans; Tuxert = tuxedo

"Gosk" Videos (1994, 1998; posted at Archive.Org as Part 1 and Part 2 in 2005):
Dockert = Dockers; Buegert = Bugle Boy Jeans; Tuxert = tuxedo in the video

Yet far more significant is the synopsis of "Glock".

He's got a license to kill but the mission never comes.Hailed as the next big star, Agent Glock is inducted into the mysterious government operation known as "The Cache," a group of black-ops trained killers and spies. After proving his worth by surviving the infamous "torture trial," Glock is given a cell phone through which he will receive communication detailing his first big mission. However the weeks pass, and the locked and loaded Glock begins to suspect the phone may never ring.

This is basically identical to a key element in a short story I copyrighted in 1987 (as part of my "'Inventing Air,' the Collected Works of Jonathan David Steinhoff"), "Gregory, The Unlucky Communist," which is part of my semi-novel, "The Coin That Came In Second", posted at Archive.Org in 2007 (pages 137-140; or Pdf pages 140-143). Gregory, The Unlucky Communist, who is very enthusiastic of being chosen at coming to here by Russia so he can being good secret Communist to overthrowing America, is told to wait for further instructions so he is happy. But then instructions never come, what is this.

So the similarity is obvious. You see, I am good, even Krysten Ritter want to be in movie with premise I give (even those who insist this is coincidence have to agree my idea good enough for them who make movie). So give me money, I do more stuff for you, please do this.

JUSTICE IS BLIND AND SOMETIMES SMASHES INTO WALLS IT DOESN'T SEE

IF THESE SPIELBERG WALLS COULD TALK
I am still working on my Spielberg/Steinhoff/"Mall Man" video project. It is not easy to sink one's teeth into a project that must deliberately exist within a context narrower than the subject matter deserves. On the one hand, Spielberg has made it possible for me to prove (to any honest, intelligent person willing to spend the time and energy to study it), through my being able to make references to copyrighted postings and other elements, that my 1993 "Mall Man" video was important to varying degrees (ranging from tremendously important to pretty important) in relation to Spielberg's "Minority Report," "Terminal," and his most recent movie, "Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull". On the other hand, however, I do not see how I can prove that my influence on his most recent movie ("Indiana Jones") goes far beyond being very significant, actually entering the realm of being key to the plot. I refer to the fact that, for this movie, Spielberg did not only use my "Mall Man" video, but in addition, my 1992 "Mall Man" film treatment was involved. It being that I cannot prove the "Mall Man" film treatment was created in 1992, it would seem that this is one "detail" I must omit. Sean Daniel and/or Steven Spielberg: my invitation for you to appear in this Spielberg/Mall Man video project of mine as my interviewees and/or my interviewers still stands!!!

LICENSE TO SKI
Having just had the chance to see for the first time the Liam Neeson movie, "Taken", which premiered yesterday on HBO, I am now more convinced than ever that the real answer to what was behind the death of Neeson's wife, Natasha Richardson, is intertwined with things I put forward in my blogs of 3.13.09 and 3.23.09. In those blogs I had found a basis for believing, for a set of reasons, that a specific tie-in had been constructed by Richardson's killers to something contained in Sean Daniel's and Bruce Willis' movie, "Jackal": the line, "You can't protect your women."

I feel certain now that it was the killers' intention to lead us back to the movie, "Jackal," thusly interconnecting our perception of their action with other things (as described in those blogs). According to what I have been able to surmise/deduce, generating this tie-in satisfied a certain (convoluted) aspect of their criteria, consistent with their "modus operandi". The fact that Neeson is currently starring in Spielberg's work-in-progress, "Lincoln," and is among the few actors to repeatedly star in Spielberg films, satisfied another part of the killers' criteria. Did I mention that I don't regard Natasha Richardson's death as an accident?

Weekly MONK/STEINHOFF VIDEOCLIP, 11.27.09/12.4.09

For this final Monk/Steinhoff weekly videoclip, I'm trying to keep it simple, however, I did find it necessary to create a "Version 1" and a "Version 2". The latter (Version 2) is clearly thinner than the former, and is not for those interested in material that solidly confirms that this 2-part "Monk" episode, as with nearly every other "Monk" episode ever made, makes reference to me and/or my material.

Anyone turning to me for closure with regard to the end of this show, personally I won't even really feel like there are no more episodes until next week or so. Or maybe in a year or two.

VERSION 1:



VERSION 2:



If I had all the time in the world to do justice to all things in the world, I might have created a Version 3, Version 4, etc. I will only add that, as has been true in general this season, the "Medium" episode airing the same night also tied in with things (we have to wonder about those Arquettes). I chose to give the night to "Monk".


WHAT MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED
For those who might generally be interested in roads not taken, perhaps it would be fun for me to list off sections and content I decided not to create for this edition of my blog:

• What Can Happen When You Are Secretly Super-Important In Relation To People Who Individually Have Billions Of Dollars, And Collectively Have Billions And Billions And Billions Of Dollars
  

• Winning Your Case By Convoluting Things To Undermine The Testimony Of The Star Witness Against You Corner
  

• Dominating Someone’s Soul By Promoting The Theory That, If You Can Put Just One Word In Someone’s Mouth Without Their Knowing, Then Everything They Ever Said Or Will Say Is Thereby Tainted And Suspect
  

• Not Publishing Certain Things In Order To Avoid Making Your Readers Afraid Of You
  

Rocks, Sun, Etc.

Thick As A Rock
I don't know how they get me to do these things:



I would likely be remiss were I to omit the fact that Joseph Gordon-Leavitt, whose Fallon and SNL appearances are referenced in this videoclip, was a "Third Rock From The Sun" cast member, which starred John Lithgow, whose sister SJ was my best friend's girlfriend when I was in the 9th grade in Princeton, New Jersey (before Lithgow was an actor, though I knew of him as SJ never stopped going on about her brother).


Monday's On The Phone To Sunday
Someone definitely wanted me to think I was seeing Eric Clapton on my way to work Monday, November 30th. It might even have been Clapton, though one doesn't think of him as someone who would wear a cowboy hat. The siting was timed with my return from vacation (visiting with my sister's family in Texas), and it was while on vacation that I spoke with the one person I know who knows the "Clapton girl" I knew at CalArts, as referenced in my April 18, 2009 blog.


That Reminds Me
I don't know whether or not Paul McCartney, who frequently does things apropos of what I do, and Billy Joel, who sat next to me on a plane in 1978 right before I received a letter from McCartney, appeared together in a broadcast Thanksgiving night 2009 in order to make me think of the time I saw Lennon perform with Elton John at the Garden Thanksgiving night 1974 (Lennon's last concert appearance, a surprise appearance I had predicted, which was what prompted me to attend in the first place - this was a month after I had worked for close Lennon friend Howard Smith, his NYC guide as well).