Cameron Is Half-Gosk
I've finally gotten around to putting together my "Cameron Is Half-Gosk" videoclips video, which is an attempt to partially describe the basis for my outlandish assertion that I influenced "Avatar". To more fully appreciate the validity of this general contention of mine, you need to also see my Feb. 21, 2010 blog article.
Half A Mind Not To Take This Case
I recently completed a story idea outline (which I posted at Archive.Org) about a private eye on some planet or another, an alien Humphrey Bogart, being hired to figure out what or who it was that caused the Earth to come to an end. It's called, "The Gumshoe From Alpha40":
http://www.archive.org/details/TheGumshoeFromAlpha40
Partial Credit For Cameron
And finally, I was mistaken in my previous blog about there being a new James Cameron movie opening next week, he is only the Executive Producer. The TV commercial misled me, they said the movie was from James Cameron. Though I am to blame, this should teach us ALL a valuable lesson, that research is always a good thing (including not taking TV commercials literally, which I did, and I should have known better). I only hope no one goes to see that movie on the false belief that Cameron directed it. It would not be the end of the world if they did, however.
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Thursday, January 27, 2011
Never Shout Bangs In A Crowded Theatre
I have been a little quiet lately, blog-wise, so am here to yap for a bit so as to protect my reputation, in that you gotta watch them quiet ones - I'm still waiting to find out where George Harrison buried the bodies.
[Disclaimer: That part about George was intended as a joke, and though a potentially tasteless one as I am not feeling up to speed at the moment (and so I must ask that you please forgive me), as such I am not responsible should somebody respond by digging up that incredibly extensive lawn of Harrison's English estate, I love that lawn.]
Let's see, still need to yap some more....
A recent Comment of mine to an article at HuffPost may be worth something:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/JonathanDS2U/skepticgate-revealing-cli_b_814013_75275653.html
And a little more....
I'm thinking about making good on the promise I made in my February 21st, 2010 blog, wherein I state that it won't be until "Avatar" is accessible via TV that I can most correctly make clear the basis for seeing my influence on this movie. In order to see my point on this, it would help if you already appreciated my influence on Spielberg, Tony and Ridley Scott, etc., in terms of your having the ability to be receptive to this extraordinary assertion on my part. You might come around to what I'm saying, if you would only just spend a billion or so hours going through my blogs and finding where evidence is presented, however, I may force myself to work around your obstinate ignorance (please ignore if you have put in the billion or so hours, I'll get around to you diligent folks later, or some other time, or, who knows, not sure I can make any promises, what with having to focus on addressing those who don't bother and so haven't the slightest idea how I can justify such outlandish statements).
February 21st, 2010 blog on "Avatar":
http://jonathands2u.blogspot.com/2010/02/james-cameron-and-steinhoff-factor-non.html
And now let me tell you a thing or two.....
I've previously touched on how my "secret" super-importance in relation to certain individuals' creative work has resulted in every situation I'm in being "infiltrated". I will not go into a whole lot of detail at this moment about what that can mean (this is something I've gone into before). However, there is one particular thing about which I would want to take a moment. Not only has my work environment been "infiltrated", as I have mentioned before. Not only has my Facebook environment been "infiltrated", as I've also mentioned before. Now it has been made manifest to me that a specific Facebook friend has demonstrated a link-up with people wiretapping my apartment/hearing me when I'm "alone" in my apartment. This person had previously reflected in what he wrote on Facebook (according to what I was able to figure out through logical deduction combined with experience) some kind of link-up with some incident my next-door neighbors had with the police. He posted an identical occurrence where he lived, simultaneously. Then an extremely unusual event happened when I went to the same barber I've been going to for 15 years: I was given a TV remote and asked to switch channels while my hair was being cut. This same Facebook friend immediately posted about using a TV remote at a dentist appointment. This reconfirmed what my previous experiences of this type regarding this person had already indicated to me. And finally, something most unusual that I said in the privacy of my apartment, out loud to myself, very shortly thereafter appeared in another posting by this person. Had I not pre-anticipated from the first that something fishy was happening, because I have encountered this before, it would be one thing. But the pieces have unmistakably fallen into place. I will have to assume someone has a gun to this person's head, or someone gave this person a false pretext for making those postings (e.g., "Hey, you know what you should do? I'll give you.... a dollar if you say post on Facebook about a TV remote in a dentist's office!" "Why?" "I'm trying something, just do it!"), or blackmail, I don't know, I do not have to regard this as a bad person despite this clear link-up with people committing a serious invasion of my space. And I don't care if I'm "secretly" super-important in relation to super - billionaires, this is a serious crime against me. These people grab hold of a good number of those with whom I come in contact, they creep me out, it's been going on a very long time, and I know how to recognize more things of this nature than the inexperienced would.
yet more....
Having in previous blogs put forth evidence that the TV shows "Medium" and "Smallville" were acting in conjunction with one another in relation to my material, it is interesting to observe that one of the main stars of "Smallville" over the years, the actor who played Lionel Luther (I'll remember his name in a minute, I promise, oh right, John Glover, that's it, that's him!), had a guest spot on the third to last "Medium" (as the series has now concluded). That Glover episode did refer to my material, but only if one contextualizes cumulatively with other usages on those shows - in this instance, Glover speaks of knowing all that is going on, as in my "Mall Man" video; Glover also speaks of no longer being who he was, as in my "Mall Man" video. Again, by themselves I wouldn't draw a connection between these "Medium" moments and my work (one might even find these two statements coupled together in various people's works simply because they are thoughts consistent with the same kind of persona, just as many different stories about the persona of an overly-muscular man might each have such a character say at some point, "I don't have to answer to anyone, because no one is more powerful than me!"). The principle of logic I am using here in deducing "Mall Man" references requires weighing a larger body of evidence than I'm describing here, but I believe the evidence is all there in previous blogs, for anyone who bothers to check it.
more.....
I once blogged that I saw Jennifer Aniston with bangs (I was mentioning her in relation to something, and was not there to make reference to a celebrity citing - despite how easy it may sometimes be to confuse me with those who are about celebrity citings). I then wrote a retraction, apologizing to whoever might care (I noticed somebody's blog had picked it up as a possible clue to the new Jen) that I thought bangs was where the hair comes to a point at both cheeks (I described this better in my retraction). Now that Aniston currently has bangs on a new magazine cover, no doubt an inevitable hair style sooner or later for society's fashion plate women (which she is, part-time anyway), I immediately see someone who looks like Ariana Huffington with bangs (I've previously referred to funny business between me and HuffPost). Then Rachel Maddow with bangs (I've previously referred to funny business between me and Maddow). I also believe I saw David Arquette and Patricia Arquette, but separately, and without bangs. So the look-alike industry and the bangs industry are my stock picks of the month (except the David Arquette look-alike, because that really was David Arquette I saw; don't know about the others).
and lastly.....
My old friend from when I was a teenager in Princeton, and now Southern Cal neighbor and Facebook friend, who shall remain nameless (for a second or two), directed/edited/etc. an unbelievable independent feature, "The Watermelon," which I was fortunate enough to see as he gave me a copy. It is already on Turner Classic Movies, despite being only a couple of years old. So as not to go on forever heaping the same old praise upon it, I will limit myself to applauding / heaping praise on this filmmaker's having managed to establish the Watermelon trailer as a perfect archetype, without compromising the tremendous heart that is the core of this movie. I am a huge believer in providing our culture with solid, new archetypes, Jung and I can tell you, we need these to develop together.
I should also make mention of the fact that Brad has suggested to me that we both might want to collaborate on a fun, not-to-be-taken-seriously, little video project. I'm hoping to convince him to do a story idea I posted on Archive.Org a few months ago, about a dead, time-traveling derelict, which I think is called, "The Dead, Time-Traveling Derelict," or something like that. But whatever happens, happens. One film I can guarantee exists, or will exist, is the new James Cameron one opening a week from Friday. Yet another work upon which I may find myself to be an influence.
[Disclaimer: That part about George was intended as a joke, and though a potentially tasteless one as I am not feeling up to speed at the moment (and so I must ask that you please forgive me), as such I am not responsible should somebody respond by digging up that incredibly extensive lawn of Harrison's English estate, I love that lawn.]
Let's see, still need to yap some more....
A recent Comment of mine to an article at HuffPost may be worth something:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/JonathanDS2U/skepticgate-revealing-cli_b_814013_75275653.html
And a little more....
I'm thinking about making good on the promise I made in my February 21st, 2010 blog, wherein I state that it won't be until "Avatar" is accessible via TV that I can most correctly make clear the basis for seeing my influence on this movie. In order to see my point on this, it would help if you already appreciated my influence on Spielberg, Tony and Ridley Scott, etc., in terms of your having the ability to be receptive to this extraordinary assertion on my part. You might come around to what I'm saying, if you would only just spend a billion or so hours going through my blogs and finding where evidence is presented, however, I may force myself to work around your obstinate ignorance (please ignore if you have put in the billion or so hours, I'll get around to you diligent folks later, or some other time, or, who knows, not sure I can make any promises, what with having to focus on addressing those who don't bother and so haven't the slightest idea how I can justify such outlandish statements).
February 21st, 2010 blog on "Avatar":
http://jonathands2u.blogspot.com/2010/02/james-cameron-and-steinhoff-factor-non.html
And now let me tell you a thing or two.....
I've previously touched on how my "secret" super-importance in relation to certain individuals' creative work has resulted in every situation I'm in being "infiltrated". I will not go into a whole lot of detail at this moment about what that can mean (this is something I've gone into before). However, there is one particular thing about which I would want to take a moment. Not only has my work environment been "infiltrated", as I have mentioned before. Not only has my Facebook environment been "infiltrated", as I've also mentioned before. Now it has been made manifest to me that a specific Facebook friend has demonstrated a link-up with people wiretapping my apartment/hearing me when I'm "alone" in my apartment. This person had previously reflected in what he wrote on Facebook (according to what I was able to figure out through logical deduction combined with experience) some kind of link-up with some incident my next-door neighbors had with the police. He posted an identical occurrence where he lived, simultaneously. Then an extremely unusual event happened when I went to the same barber I've been going to for 15 years: I was given a TV remote and asked to switch channels while my hair was being cut. This same Facebook friend immediately posted about using a TV remote at a dentist appointment. This reconfirmed what my previous experiences of this type regarding this person had already indicated to me. And finally, something most unusual that I said in the privacy of my apartment, out loud to myself, very shortly thereafter appeared in another posting by this person. Had I not pre-anticipated from the first that something fishy was happening, because I have encountered this before, it would be one thing. But the pieces have unmistakably fallen into place. I will have to assume someone has a gun to this person's head, or someone gave this person a false pretext for making those postings (e.g., "Hey, you know what you should do? I'll give you.... a dollar if you say post on Facebook about a TV remote in a dentist's office!" "Why?" "I'm trying something, just do it!"), or blackmail, I don't know, I do not have to regard this as a bad person despite this clear link-up with people committing a serious invasion of my space. And I don't care if I'm "secretly" super-important in relation to super - billionaires, this is a serious crime against me. These people grab hold of a good number of those with whom I come in contact, they creep me out, it's been going on a very long time, and I know how to recognize more things of this nature than the inexperienced would.
yet more....
Having in previous blogs put forth evidence that the TV shows "Medium" and "Smallville" were acting in conjunction with one another in relation to my material, it is interesting to observe that one of the main stars of "Smallville" over the years, the actor who played Lionel Luther (I'll remember his name in a minute, I promise, oh right, John Glover, that's it, that's him!), had a guest spot on the third to last "Medium" (as the series has now concluded). That Glover episode did refer to my material, but only if one contextualizes cumulatively with other usages on those shows - in this instance, Glover speaks of knowing all that is going on, as in my "Mall Man" video; Glover also speaks of no longer being who he was, as in my "Mall Man" video. Again, by themselves I wouldn't draw a connection between these "Medium" moments and my work (one might even find these two statements coupled together in various people's works simply because they are thoughts consistent with the same kind of persona, just as many different stories about the persona of an overly-muscular man might each have such a character say at some point, "I don't have to answer to anyone, because no one is more powerful than me!"). The principle of logic I am using here in deducing "Mall Man" references requires weighing a larger body of evidence than I'm describing here, but I believe the evidence is all there in previous blogs, for anyone who bothers to check it.
more.....
I once blogged that I saw Jennifer Aniston with bangs (I was mentioning her in relation to something, and was not there to make reference to a celebrity citing - despite how easy it may sometimes be to confuse me with those who are about celebrity citings). I then wrote a retraction, apologizing to whoever might care (I noticed somebody's blog had picked it up as a possible clue to the new Jen) that I thought bangs was where the hair comes to a point at both cheeks (I described this better in my retraction). Now that Aniston currently has bangs on a new magazine cover, no doubt an inevitable hair style sooner or later for society's fashion plate women (which she is, part-time anyway), I immediately see someone who looks like Ariana Huffington with bangs (I've previously referred to funny business between me and HuffPost). Then Rachel Maddow with bangs (I've previously referred to funny business between me and Maddow). I also believe I saw David Arquette and Patricia Arquette, but separately, and without bangs. So the look-alike industry and the bangs industry are my stock picks of the month (except the David Arquette look-alike, because that really was David Arquette I saw; don't know about the others).
and lastly.....
My old friend from when I was a teenager in Princeton, and now Southern Cal neighbor and Facebook friend, who shall remain nameless (for a second or two), directed/edited/etc. an unbelievable independent feature, "The Watermelon," which I was fortunate enough to see as he gave me a copy. It is already on Turner Classic Movies, despite being only a couple of years old. So as not to go on forever heaping the same old praise upon it, I will limit myself to applauding / heaping praise on this filmmaker's having managed to establish the Watermelon trailer as a perfect archetype, without compromising the tremendous heart that is the core of this movie. I am a huge believer in providing our culture with solid, new archetypes, Jung and I can tell you, we need these to develop together.
I should also make mention of the fact that Brad has suggested to me that we both might want to collaborate on a fun, not-to-be-taken-seriously, little video project. I'm hoping to convince him to do a story idea I posted on Archive.Org a few months ago, about a dead, time-traveling derelict, which I think is called, "The Dead, Time-Traveling Derelict," or something like that. But whatever happens, happens. One film I can guarantee exists, or will exist, is the new James Cameron one opening a week from Friday. Yet another work upon which I may find myself to be an influence.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
